H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-1

Sara Gomer and Emiko Okagawa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1987 San Diego round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Gomer

GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H

1 – 1

2 main-draw meetings

Emiko Okagawa

JPN Age 61

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Sara Gomer #55	6-1 6-2	Emiko Okagawa	Match data	Aug 6, 1987*	R32	San Diego	WTA 500	Hard
Emiko Okagawa	7-6 7-6	Sara Gomer #54	Match data	Apr 30, 1987*	R32	Singapore Tennis Open	WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Sara Gomer	#317	#46	18	1,778	105	132	44.3%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Emiko Okagawa	—	—	—	1,523	18	39	31.6%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Sara Gomer							Emiko Okagawa
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	1–2	33.3%	—	1,482	0	0
16	1980	2–1	66.7%	—	1,518	0	0	1981	0–1	0.0%	—	1,476	0	0
17	1981	7–8	46.7%	—	1,517	0	0	1982	1–2	33.3%	—	1,480	0	0
18	1982	6–4	60.0%	—	1,545	0	0	1983	0–2	0.0%	—	1,454	0	0
19	1983	3–7	30.0%	—	1,531	0	0	1984	5–6	45.5%	—	1,473	0	0
20	1984	1–5	16.7%	#128	1,510	0	0	1985	1–8	11.1%	—	1,437	0	0
21	1985	10–15	40.0%	#101	1,568	0	0	1986	3–5	37.5%	—	1,458	0	0
22	1986	13–14	48.1%	#59	1,660	0	0	1987	4–6	40.0%	—	1,487	0	0
23	1987	18–19	48.6%	#72	1,680	0	0	1988	3–4	42.9%	—	1,488	0	0
24	1988	20–16	55.6%	#51	1,747	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1989	7–12	36.8%	#124	1,638	0	1	1990	0–1	0.0%	—	1,474	0	0
26	1990	6–8	42.9%	#92	1,635	0	1	1991	0–1	0.0%	—	1,458	0	0
27	1991	8–13	38.1%	#120	1,660	0	1	1992	0–1	0.0%	—	1,447	0	0
28	1992	4–10	28.6%	#173	1,556	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Sara Gomer																	Emiko Okagawa
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1981	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1982	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1983	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1983	2	1	3	66.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	1984	4	3	7	57.1%	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1984	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	4	5	20.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1985	0	3	3	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
21	1985	3	6	9	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	5	6	11	45.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	1986	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%
22	1986	8	6	14	57.1%	0	3	3	0.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1	2	3	33.3%	1987	4	3	7	57.1%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
23	1987	10	10	20	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1988	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—
24	1988	14	11	25	56.0%	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1989	1	6	7	14.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1990	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1990	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	3	3	6	50.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	1991	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1991	5	7	12	41.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1992	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1992	3	6	9	33.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	47	57	104	45.2%	8	17	25	32.0%	32	39	71	45.1%	7	10	17	41.2%	—	12	22	34	35.3%	2	8	10	20.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	2	4	6	33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Sara Gomer																Emiko Okagawa
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	1483	96.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	42.9%	-1.14	0–1	1–0	—	+0.30
16	1980	1519	104.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	66.7%	+0.83	—	—	—	+0.03	1981	1476	100.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.50	—	—	—	-0.02
17	1981	1517	109.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	45.5%	-0.09	2–1 (67%)	2–1 (67%)	102.6	+0.09	1982	1481	93.6	—	—	—	—	+51	—	—	28.6%	-1.72	1–0	—	—	-0.03
18	1982	1545	105.7	—	—	—	—	—	-19	—	60.0%	+0.55	—	2–0	—	+1.20	1983	1454	93.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	—	—	+0.41
19	1983	1532	102.6	—	—	—	—	+81	—	+22	40.0%	-0.92	1–4 (20%)	2–2 (50%)	97.8	+0.59	1984	1474	103.8	—	—	—	—	+63	+71	—	50.0%	-0.31	1–3 (25%)	2–0	—	+1.75
20	1984	1511	108.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	+34	26.7%	-1.60	1–2 (33%)	0–2	—	+0.16	1985	1437	95.8	—	—	—	—	+60	+70	—	15.0%	-2.70	1–1	1–1	—	-0.01
21	1985	1568	117.6	—	—	—	—	-18	—	+24	42.9%	-0.46	2–4 (33%)	4–3 (57%)	98.6	+1.64	1986	1458	103.7	—	—	—	—	+45	—	—	45.0%	-0.20	1–3 (25%)	0–2	—	+0.89
22	1986	1660	119.5	—	—	—	—	-6	-213	-39	46.9%	-0.28	6–4 (60%)	4–4 (50%)	103.7	+0.62	1987	1487	97.6	—	—	—	—	+53	—	—	38.1%	-1.48	1–0	5–0 (100%)	—	+1.14
23	1987	1680	131.9	—	—	—	—	-13	—	-6	46.3%	-0.39	6–2 (75%)	5–5 (50%)	105.2	-0.33	1988	1489	93.8	—	—	—	—	+24	—	—	42.9%	-1.21	—	1–0	—	+1.03
24	1988	1747	138.3	—	—	—	—	-19	—	-34	53.7%	+0.15	6–4 (60%)	9–4 (69%)	108.3	-0.39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1989	1639	114.0	—	—	—	—	-23	-117	+78	43.5%	-0.78	2–6 (25%)	1–0	—	-0.51	1990	1474	94.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.10
26	1990	1636	113.1	—	—	—	—	-36	—	+106	42.4%	-0.48	3–2 (60%)	1–3 (25%)	99.2	+0.82	1991	1458	97.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-2.00	0–1	—	—	+0.22
27	1991	1661	134.5	—	—	—	—	-33	—	+111	40.4%	-0.55	2–3 (40%)	0–3 (0%)	97.6	-1.11	1992	1447	96.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	—	—	+0.06
28	1992	1557	104.1	—	—	—	—	+24	-82	—	34.4%	-1.06	1–3 (25%)	1–3 (25%)	94.9	+1.43	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1779	127.6	—	—	—	—	-13	-99	+25	45.3%	-0.39	32–35 (48%)	31–30 (51%)	102.3	+1.79	—	1524	94.4	—	—	—	—	+49	+71	—	35.2%	-1.34	5–9 (36%)	10–3 (77%)	103.8	+10.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Sara Gomer's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Steffi Graf	0	5	5	Mar 16, 1988	H2H
Zina Garrison	0	4	4	Jun 26, 1991	H2H
Nathalie Herreman	1	3	4	Apr 24, 1991	H2H
Jo Durie	1	3	4	Jun 21, 1990	H2H
Pam Shriver	0	4	4	Jun 30, 1989	H2H

Emiko Okagawa's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Adriana Villagran Reami	1	2	3	Oct 16, 1986	H2H
Kristin Kinney	1	2	3	Jul 25, 1985	H2H
Julie Harrington	1	2	3	Oct 14, 1982	H2H
Sara Gomer	1	1	2	Aug 6, 1987	H2H
Gigi Fernandez	0	2	2	Oct 23, 1986	H2H