H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-2
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1991 US Open second round 6-2 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1985* | Monticello | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 7-6 5-7 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |