H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Hu Na H2H: 0-1
Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1986 Los Angeles second round 1-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Hu Na | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |