H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 0-1
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1989 San Diego third round 5-7 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1989* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |