H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Julie Salmon H2H: 1-0
Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Salmon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1986 Birmingham third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1986* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sara Gomer | 6-1 6-4 | Julie Salmon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julie Salmon | — | — | — | 1,544 | 15 | 51 | 22.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Julie Salmon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,377 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,363 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,351 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,342 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |