H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Karen Schimper H2H: 1-1
Sara Gomer and Karen Schimper are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karen Schimper leads 1–0 on clay, while Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karen Schimper won the 1989 Amelia Island third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 59
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1989* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Karen Schimper | 7-5 6-3 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1988* | Aptos | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-1 6-0 | Karen Schimper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Karen Schimper | #486 | #75 | 11 | 1,651 | 24 | 43 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Karen Schimper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #93 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |