H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-1
Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1988 Seoul Olympics third round 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1988* | Seoul Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 9-7 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,779 | 105 | 132 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,927 | 240 | 241 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Gomer | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,752 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |