Sara Gomer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Sara Gomer and Laura Arraya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on clay, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1990 Albuquerque round of 32 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | 6-4 7-6 | Sara Gomer | Match data | Aug 9, 1990* | R32 | Albuquerque | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Sara Gomer | 6-2 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data | May 27, 1987* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 105 | 132 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1983 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 20 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1985 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1985 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 23 | 1987 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1987 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1990 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 27 | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Career | — | 47 | 57 | 104 | 45.2% | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 32 | 39 | 71 | 45.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | 105 | 80 | 185 | 56.8% | 103 | 73 | 176 | 58.5% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 28 | 31 | 59 | 47.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1980 | 1519 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.7% | +0.83 | — | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1517 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.5% | -0.09 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.6 | +0.09 | 1981 | 1685 | 129.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | — | — | 65.6% | +0.74 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -1.24 |
| 18 | 1982 | 1545 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | 60.0% | +0.55 | — | 2–0 | — | +1.20 | 1982 | 1742 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | -61 | -27 | — | 62.7% | +0.91 | 10–8 (56%) | 8–5 (62%) | 102.3 | +2.71 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1532 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +22 | 40.0% | -0.92 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.8 | +0.59 | 1983 | 1713 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +30 | — | 51.4% | -0.24 | 8–11 (42%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.2 | +0.84 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1511 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | 26.7% | -1.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.16 | 1984 | 1760 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | -102 | +141 | -132 | 53.8% | +0.03 | 18–5 (78%) | 9–4 (69%) | 110.1 | +0.94 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1568 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | — | +24 | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.6 | +1.64 | 1985 | 1692 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +60 | — | 45.1% | -0.27 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.8 | +1.84 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1660 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -213 | -39 | 46.9% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.62 | 1986 | 1718 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +100 | — | 51.0% | -0.04 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | 100.4 | -1.79 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1680 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -6 | 46.3% | -0.39 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.2 | -0.33 | 1987 | 1770 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -11 | -184 | 51.6% | +0.05 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–3 (0%) | 100.0 | -2.60 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1747 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | -34 | 53.7% | +0.15 | 6–4 (60%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.3 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 1639 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -117 | +78 | 43.5% | -0.78 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.51 | 1989 | 1883 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -146 | -254 | 65.2% | +0.79 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.9 | +0.41 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1636 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +106 | 42.4% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | +0.82 | 1990 | 1821 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -55 | -173 | 55.4% | +0.46 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.6 | +0.41 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1661 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -33 | — | +111 | 40.4% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–3 (0%) | 97.6 | -1.11 | 1991 | 1823 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -70 | -95 | 56.9% | +0.19 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.5 | +2.96 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1557 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -82 | — | 34.4% | -1.06 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.9 | +1.43 | 1992 | 1733 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +53 | +3 | 49.4% | +0.06 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.6 | +1.62 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1682 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +124 | +9 | 44.0% | -0.66 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–0 | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 1779 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -99 | +25 | 45.3% | -0.39 | 32–35 (48%) | 31–30 (51%) | 102.3 | +1.79 | — | 1923 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +27 | -133 | 54.6% | +0.19 | 90–63 (59%) | 50–44 (53%) | 104.5 | +1.27 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mareen Louie Harper | 5 | 3 | 8 | Jan 31, 1992 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Patricia Medrado | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 9, 1986 | H2H |
| Akiko Kijimuta | 6 | 0 | 6 | Feb 1, 1992 | H2H |