H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0

Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Gomer #95 6-4 6-4 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Jun 19, 1991* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Gomer — #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Gomer Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 1985 10–15 40.0% — 1,568 0 0 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,636 0 1 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,557 0 1 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Gomer Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Gomer Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.04 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1981 1518 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.07 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.10 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +23 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.58 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1984 1511 108.4 — — — — — — +35 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 1985 1569 117.7 — — — — -19 — +23 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.60 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 1986 1661 119.7 — — — — -6 -214 -40 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.63 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 1987 1680 132.1 — — — — -12 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.40 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 1988 1747 138.4 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.43 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 1989 1639 114.1 — — — — -24 -116 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.42 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 1990 1636 113.2 — — — — -36 — +108 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 1991 1661 134.6 — — — — -33 — +113 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1779 127.7 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.72 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.