H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-1
Sara Gomer and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1991 Montreal third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1991* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-3 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-0 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Gomer | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |