H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1991 Eastbourne third round 6-2 6-2.

GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 3
3 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-2 6-2 Sara Gomer #95 Match data
Jan 16, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #4 6-1 6-0 Sara Gomer #93 Match data
Aug 29, 1985* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #106 6-1 6-4 Sara Gomer #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 104 130 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Gomer Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1980 2–1 66.7% 1,519 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1981 7–8 46.7% 1,517 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1982 6–4 60.0% 1,546 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,533 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,512 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,569 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,679 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1988 19–15 55.9% #51 1,744 0 1 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1992 4–9 30.8% #173 1,577 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7