H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-2 6-2 Sara Gomer #95 Match data Jun 20, 1991* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Mary Joe Fernandez #4 6-1 6-0 Sara Gomer #93 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mary Joe Fernandez 6-1 6-4 Sara Gomer Match data Aug 29, 1985* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,196 417 195 68.1% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Gomer Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,553 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,765 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,896 0 0
16 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,947 0 0
17 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,985 0 0
18 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,125 0 2
19 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1992 51–17 75.0% #6 2,121 0 2
21 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,058 0 3
22 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,977 0 4
23 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,039 0 6
24 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1 1996 30–17 63.8% #16 1,935 0 6
25 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,990 0 7
26 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,935 0 7
27 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,901 0 7
28 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,880 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Gomer Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
18 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 17 4 21 81.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
19 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1991 22 8 30 73.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 27 8 35 77.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 16 4 20 80.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 13 5 18 72.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 14 4 18 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1997 22 8 30 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2% — 203 91 294 69.0% 109 49 158 69.0% 55 22 77 71.4% 50 33 83 60.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Gomer Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1475 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.18
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1554 130.0 — — — — +65 — — 50.0% +0.04 0–2 2–0 — -0.49
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1765 147.3 — — — — -82 -11 -174 54.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -4.54
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1897 158.0 — — — — -60 -77 -252 61.2% +1.15 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -5.16
16 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.03 1988 1947 151.0 — — — — -47 -156 -175 68.2% +1.45 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 103.5 -2.13
17 1981 1517 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09 1989 1986 162.4 — — — — -24 -108 -155 63.2% +1.20 9–3 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 -2.80
18 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.20 1990 2126 168.3 — — — — +40 -229 -238 79.2% +2.17 7–2 (78%) 4–0 (100%) 107.8 +0.66
19 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59 1991 2063 164.9 — — — — +20 -103 -62 69.6% +1.53 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 -0.78
20 1984 1511 108.2 — — — — — — +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16 1992 2121 171.9 — — — — +33 -59 -48 69.4% +1.32 11–2 (85%) 6–5 (55%) 106.9 -1.97
21 1985 1568 117.6 — — — — -18 — +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64 1993 2058 164.0 — — — — +1 +127 -28 66.1% +1.05 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 105.3 +0.67
22 1986 1660 119.5 — — — — -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62 1994 1977 147.9 — — — — +8 +146 +2 66.2% +0.96 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 99.6 +0.06
23 1987 1680 131.9 — — — — -13 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33 1995 2039 159.3 — — — — +38 -7 -10 64.8% +1.11 10–1 (91%) 4–3 (57%) 107.6 -0.51
24 1988 1747 138.3 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39 1996 1935 158.7 — — — — -4 +81 +198 61.9% +1.09 7–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 103.3 -1.36
25 1989 1639 114.0 — — — — -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.51 1997 1990 164.4 — — — — +18 +53 +117 66.9% +1.20 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.63
26 1990 1636 113.1 — — — — -36 — +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82 1998 1935 150.6 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 101.7 -1.81
27 1991 1661 134.5 — — — — -33 — +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11 1999 1902 152.1 — — — — -1 +93 — 56.5% +0.72 6–5 (55%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -2.78
28 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43 2000 1881 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21
Career — 1779 127.6 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79 — 2197 168.6 — — — — +6 -13 -56 64.9% +1.15 100–45 (69%) 53–48 (52%) 107.6 -4.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.