H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-0
Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1988 Birmingham second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1988* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sara Gomer | 6-4 6-0 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |