H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-3

Nathalie Herreman holds a 3–1 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Herreman leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1991 Barcelona round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #115 6-2 6-4 Sara Gomer #87 Match data Apr 24, 1991* R64 Barcelona Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Sara Gomer #89 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #80 Match data Mar 16, 1991* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nathalie Herreman #115 6-3 6-2 Sara Gomer #83 Match data May 8, 1986* R32 Barcelona WTA 250 Clay
Nathalie Herreman 6-4 3-6 7-6 Sara Gomer Match data Nov 16, 1983* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Gomer Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Gomer Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Gomer Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.03 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1981 1517 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.20 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1984 1511 108.2 — — — — — — +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1985 1568 117.6 — — — — -18 — +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1986 1660 119.5 — — — — -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1987 1680 131.9 — — — — -13 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1988 1747 138.3 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1989 1639 114.0 — — — — -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.51 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1990 1636 113.1 — — — — -36 — +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1991 1661 134.5 — — — — -33 — +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1779 127.6 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.