H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-2
Stephanie Rehe holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1992 Key Biscayne first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 7-5 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1988* | Aptos | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-2 7-6 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1986* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-4 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |