H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-0

Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1986 Canadian Open round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Gomer #80 6-3 6-1 Terry Holladay Match data Aug 7, 1986* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Terry Holladay #395 #39 7 1,942 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Gomer Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,880 0 1
21 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,935 0 1
22 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,860 0 1
23 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,829 0 1
24 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,825 0 1
25 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,672 0 1
26 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,638 0 1
27 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,678 0 1
28 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,676 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,608 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,627 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,511 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Gomer Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Gomer Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
16 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.03 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 1981 1517 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.20 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +1.00
19 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +3.05
20 1984 1511 108.2 — — — — — — +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16 1976 1881 145.1 — — — — +18 -233 -149 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -2.82
21 1985 1568 117.6 — — — — -18 — +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64 1977 1935 148.1 — — — — -11 — -129 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -5.13
22 1986 1660 119.5 — — — — -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62 1978 1860 129.1 — — — — -14 — -55 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.1 -1.83
23 1987 1680 131.9 — — — — -13 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33 1979 1830 140.2 — — — — -3 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.65
24 1988 1747 138.3 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39 1980 1825 148.0 — — — — +8 — -5 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -3.22
25 1989 1639 114.0 — — — — -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.51 1981 1672 108.6 — — — — +73 — +82 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1990 1636 113.1 — — — — -36 — +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82 1982 1638 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
27 1991 1661 134.5 — — — — -33 — +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11 1983 1679 131.8 — — — — +14 — +103 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.24
28 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43 1984 1677 119.7 — — — — +9 — +71 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.76
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1608 118.7 — — — — +24 — +88 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1628 114.8 — — — — -6 — +92 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 88.0 — — — — +46 — +95 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.19
Career — 1779 127.6 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79 — 1943 138.0 — — — — +8 -60 -15 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.9 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.