H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0
Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1988 Aptos third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1988* | Aptos | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-3 7-5 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |