H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 1-1
Sara Sorribes Tormo and Camila Giorgi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on clay, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2021 Rome second round 7-6(4) 6-7(7) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 7-6(4) 6-7(7) 7-5 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2020* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |