H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 0-2
Kiki Bertens holds a 2–0 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2017 Gstaad semifinal 6-1 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2017* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 0-0 (ret.) | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2016* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-4 6-3 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |