H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC

Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2016 Korea Open first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Sorribes Tormo
Spain Age 30 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Sorribes Tormo #139 6-1 6-3 Tamira Paszek Match data Sep 22, 2016* R32 Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Sorribes Tormo #194 #32 1,760 1,852 143 147 49.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Sorribes Tormo Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2015 2–3 40.0% #181 1,508 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2016 6–9 40.0% #107 1,548 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2017 15–18 45.5% #104 1,593 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2018 7–13 35.0% #86 1,589 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2019 12–18 40.0% #84 1,636 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2020 7–12 36.8% #66 1,676 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2021 33–19 63.5% #36 1,773 0 1 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2022 22–18 55.0% #61 1,733 0 1 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2023 19–9 67.9% #48 1,777 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2024 17–20 45.9% #106 1,704 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2025 1–3 25.0% #290 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2026 2–5 28.6% #194 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Sorribes Tormo Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2016 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2017 8 10 18 44.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2018 1 8 9 11.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2020 4 8 12 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2021 27 12 39 69.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2022 9 10 19 47.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2023 9 4 13 69.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2024 8 10 18 44.4% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 75 74 149 50.3% 57 57 114 50.0% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 275/287 of Sara Sorribes Tormo's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Sorribes Tormo Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2015 5/5 0.6 4.6 62.8% 66.9% 45.1% 22.9% 39.1% 58.0% 41.7% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2016 15/16 0.8 7.5 58.2% 56.0% 38.9% 41.3% 57.3% 49.1% 45.5% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2017 33/33 0.1 8.4 62.5% 56.7% 33.4% 44.9% 54.0% 47.7% 45.0% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2018 20/20 0.1 7.3 61.9% 50.9% 32.5% 45.9% 46.0% 43.9% 42.0% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2019 30/30 0.5 5.1 66.1% 55.8% 38.3% 42.1% 46.9% 49.9% 45.7% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2020 19/19 0.2 3.3 70.3% 54.8% 39.6% 47.8% 54.1% 50.2% 46.9% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2021 43/52 0.6 3.2 67.9% 58.4% 44.2% 48.3% 55.5% 53.6% 48.0% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2022 40/40 0.4 3.3 71.2% 58.2% 46.3% 51.3% 47.3% 55.0% 48.5% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2023 27/28 0.7 4.8 68.8% 60.1% 41.8% 54.3% 65.5% 54.3% 52.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2024 36/37 0.4 2.7 72.2% 51.2% 42.4% 43.0% 52.5% 48.9% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2026 7/7 1.0 1.7 68.9% 54.9% 39.9% 37.6% 54.8% 51.0% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 275/291 0.4 4.7 67.3% 56.3% 40.5% 46.2% 52.8% 51.0% 47.0% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Sorribes Tormo Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2015 1509 107.6 +0.23 -1.52 0.995 48.8% — +42 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.03 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2016 1549 108.9 -4.48 +1.18 0.894 47.3% -50 +79 — 41.2% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.29 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2017 1593 111.7 -6.49 +0.81 0.860 46.5% -37 +78 — 45.9% -0.61 6–4 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 102.9 -0.46 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2018 1590 107.9 -8.26 -1.27 0.748 43.0% -45 +100 — 35.7% -1.52 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.41 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2019 1637 117.1 -5.23 +1.40 0.911 47.8% -61 +100 -26 40.0% -0.55 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.9 -0.10 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2020 1677 134.0 -3.76 +2.81 0.941 48.7% -36 +39 — 41.9% -0.63 1–6 (14%) 1–0 — -0.72 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2021 1774 143.0 -2.15 +3.93 1.033 50.8% +25 -108 -103 58.9% +0.61 12–6 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.5 +0.91 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2022 1733 133.5 -1.24 +4.09 1.077 51.7% -15 +48 -90 53.8% +0.48 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 100.4 +0.94 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2023 1778 137.7 -0.72 +7.08 1.155 53.4% -6 -13 — 63.2% +1.14 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2024 1705 126.8 -5.87 +2.16 0.903 47.6% +8 +35 -127 47.7% -0.49 7–7 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2025 1616 110.8 — — — — — +61 — 25.0% -2.25 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2026 1627 114.1 -2.24 +1.84 1.011 50.2% — +86 — 37.5% -0.62 0–2 0–2 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1853 129.8 -3.86 +2.62 0.957 49.0% -12 +46 -86 48.7% -0.16 47–40 (54%) 24–25 (49%) 101.5 -0.41 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.