H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Alexandra Fusai H2H: 2-1
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 2–1 lead over Alexandra Fusai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1999 Palermo third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1999* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-2 6-1 | Alexandra Fusai | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-4 6-3 | Alexandra Fusai | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1997* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alexandra Fusai | 6-1 6-0 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alexandra Fusai | #1,030 | #37 | 691 | 1,759 | 89 | 147 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Alexandra Fusai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #39 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #177 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |