H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Florencia Labat H2H: 2-0
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 2–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1997 Hilton Head second round 0-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1997* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 0-6 6-4 7-5 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1996* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 7-5 7-6 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |