H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 2-0
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 2–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 2001 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-3 6-3 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1999* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-1 6-3 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Kristie Boogert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |