H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 2–0 on carpet, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1999 Tokyo third round 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1996* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 7-5 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |