H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 0-1
María Emilia Salerni holds a 1–0 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Emilia Salerni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Emilia Salerni won the 2001 Auckland third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2001* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | María Emilia Salerni | 6-4 6-4 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |