H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 0-1
Mariaan De Swardt holds a 1–0 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariaan De Swardt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariaan De Swardt won the 1996 Cardiff fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1996* | Cardiff | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-3 6-2 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |