H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Miho Saeki H2H: 0-1
Miho Saeki holds a 1–0 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miho Saeki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miho Saeki won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Miho Saeki | 7-5 7-5 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Miho Saeki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |