H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 1-3
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 3–1 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1998 Strasbourg third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1998* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-4 6-3 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1996* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 7-6 6-3 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1995* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-4 7-5 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1995* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Shi-Ting Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |