H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Selima Sfar vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-1
Selima Sfar and Asa Carlsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay, while Selima Sfar leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-0 6-2 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Selima Sfar | 6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Selima Sfar | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |