H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Selima Sfar vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics first round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Selima Sfar
TUN Age 49 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #12 6-4 6-0 Selima Sfar #382 Match data Jul 26, 1996* R64 Atlanta Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Selima Sfar #1,005 #75 456 1,590 21 56 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Selima Sfar Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #502 1,497 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2
22 2000 0–1 0.0% #160 1,486 0 0 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3
23 2001 8–12 40.0% #82 1,521 0 0 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3
24 2002 5–13 27.8% #139 1,499 0 0 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5
25 2003 0–3 0.0% #154 1,475 0 0 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6
26 2004 3–3 50.0% #118 1,521 0 0 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7
27 2005 2–10 16.7% #193 1,440 0 0 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7
28 2006 1–5 16.7% #181 1,425 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7
29 2007 0–2 0.0% #166 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–3 25.0% #198 1,428 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2009 1–1 50.0% #281 1,445 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 0–2 0.0% #452 1,436 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Selima Sfar Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
24 2002 2 7 9 22.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 2004 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2%
27 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 33 44 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Selima Sfar Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87
18 1996 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.12 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55
22 2000 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23
23 2001 1521 118.1 — — — — +30 +32 +23 41.7% -0.38 4–4 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 98.6 +0.22 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33
24 2002 1499 110.5 — — — — +14 +26 +23 33.3% -0.90 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 -0.83 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45
25 2003 1475 94.6 +0.29 -2.39 0.326 31.6% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — 0–1 — -0.14 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96
26 2004 1522 115.0 — — — — +36 — — 22.2% -2.00 1–0 — — -0.29 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20
27 2005 1440 100.3 +0.90 -1.65 0.817 45.0% +44 — — 22.2% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.68 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05
28 2006 1426 105.4 -2.14 -0.54 0.765 44.1% +51 — — 21.4% -1.72 1–1 — — -0.02 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
29 2007 1416 104.3 -0.73 -2.75 0.768 43.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1429 111.6 +1.09 +2.41 0.851 46.9% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1446 106.1 -0.26 +0.36 0.848 45.8% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1436 99.1 -3.09 -0.72 0.761 44.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16
Career — 1591 114.9 -0.72 -0.33 0.763 44.1% +32 +28 +23 29.5% -1.29 7–11 (39%) 5–13 (28%) 96.4 -0.99 — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.