H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Selima Sfar vs Camille Pin H2H: 1-0
Selima Sfar holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Pin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Selima Sfar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Selima Sfar won the 2004 Cincinnati third round 6-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2004* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Selima Sfar | 6-4 (ret.) | Camille Pin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camille Pin | #1,143 | #61 | 752 | 1,619 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Selima Sfar | Camille Pin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |