H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Selima Sfar vs Evie Dominikovic H2H: 0-1
Evie Dominikovic holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evie Dominikovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evie Dominikovic won the 2001 San Diego second round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2001* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Evie Dominikovic | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evie Dominikovic | #633 | #64 | 548 | 1,564 | 27 | 58 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Selima Sfar | Evie Dominikovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #83 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #114 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #206 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |