H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Selima Sfar vs Yuka Yoshida H2H: 1-0
Selima Sfar holds a 1–0 lead over Yuka Yoshida in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Selima Sfar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Selima Sfar won the 2001 Canberra third round 4-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2001* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Selima Sfar | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Yuka Yoshida | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yuka Yoshida | #906 | #52 | 476 | 1,625 | 39 | 64 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Selima Sfar | Yuka Yoshida | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #201 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #102 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #70 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #227 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #158 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |