H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-0

Serena Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2013 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-0 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 — — — — — — —
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 — — — — — — —
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 — — — — — — —
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 — — — — — — —
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 — — — — — — —
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8