H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1984 Washington Open round of 32 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger #3 6-2 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jan 5, 1984* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 — — — — — — —
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,678 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,615 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,709 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,757 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,787 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,797 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,599 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.42 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.41 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.33 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1975 1662 127.7 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -163 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1977 1720 135.3 — — — — +62 -286 +40 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1978 1679 127.1 — — — — -13 -250 +61 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1979 1615 121.5 — — — — -26 — +89 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -130 -187 +1 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.4 -3.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1841 144.0 — — — — -77 — +12 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1758 137.6 — — — — -81 — +74 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1788 131.0 — — — — -87 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1798 135.6 — — — — -156 — +84 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1623 115.8 — — — — +9 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 1599 97.4 — — — — -3 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 1598 109.9 — — — — -27 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.9 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.2 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.