H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 4-2

Sharon Walsh Pete holds a 4–2 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1985 Denver fourth round 2-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 1985* Denver WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sharon Walsh Pete 2-6 6-1 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen #77 Match data
Aug 10, 1980 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Feb 26, 1977* Detroit WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Nov 5, 1976* London WTA 250 R16 Carpet Betsy Nagelsen 6-3 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Aug 21, 1974* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Aug 4, 1973* Atlantic City WTA 250 R16 Hard Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 6-7 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,894 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,833 0 2 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,707 0 2 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,729 0 3 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,653 0 4 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,774 0 7 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,620 0 7 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,722 0 7 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,620 0 7 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,712 0 7 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,841 0 8 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,758 0 8 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,810 0 8 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,808 0 8 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,627 0 8 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,602 0 8 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6