H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 4-2

Sharon Walsh Pete holds a 4–2 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1985 Denver round of 16 2-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 70 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sharon Walsh Pete 2-6 6-1 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen #77 Match data Jan 18, 1985* R16 Denver WTA 250 Carpet
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Aug 13, 1980* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Feb 26, 1977* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen 6-3 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Nov 5, 1976* R16 London WTA 250 Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 21, 1974* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 6-7 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Aug 4, 1973* R16 Atlantic City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Betsy Nagelsen — #25 28 1,892 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,707 0 3
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,657 0 3
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,755 0 5
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,808 0 6
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,719 0 7 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,706 0 6
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,678 0 7 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,693 0 6
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,615 0 7 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,631 0 6
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,709 0 7 1985 14–12 53.8% — 1,714 0 6
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,840 0 8 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,757 0 8 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,646 0 6
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,787 0 8 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,797 0 8 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,623 0 8 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,599 0 8 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,608 0 6
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 1993 0–4 0.0% — 1,511 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.54
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.49
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.24
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1976 1708 124.4 — — — — -64 -115 +73 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.59
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.42 1977 1678 124.1 — — — — -30 -106 +48 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.41 1978 1658 129.7 — — — — -102 -84 +101 41.2% -0.57 4–11 (27%) 3–7 (30%) 91.9 -1.33
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.33 1979 1695 123.1 — — — — -131 — +13 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.74
23 1975 1662 127.7 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 +0.15 1980 1756 131.7 — — — — -144 — +38 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -2.08
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -163 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.29 1981 1809 135.3 — — — — -128 -307 +95 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.62
25 1977 1720 135.3 — — — — +62 -286 +40 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.10 1982 1706 123.4 — — — — -98 -215 +169 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 +0.16
26 1978 1679 127.1 — — — — -13 -250 +61 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 -0.71 1983 1693 127.0 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.86
27 1979 1615 121.5 — — — — -26 — +89 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.88 1984 1632 126.6 — — — — +58 -142 +116 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.78
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -130 -187 +1 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.4 -3.84 1985 1714 129.7 — — — — -25 — +88 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.14
29 1981 1841 144.0 — — — — -77 — +12 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.17 1986 1700 131.2 — — — — -55 — +170 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.52
30 1982 1758 137.6 — — — — -81 — +74 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 1987 1646 121.7 — — — — -24 — +150 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.59
31 1983 1788 131.0 — — — — -87 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.20 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -26 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.50
32 1984 1798 135.6 — — — — -156 — +84 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 1989 1663 126.1 — — — — -56 — +97 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.46
33 1985 1623 115.8 — — — — +9 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.34 1990 1640 115.1 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 1986 1599 97.4 — — — — -3 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 1987 1598 109.9 — — — — -27 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.50 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -50 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 1988 1507 84.9 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 1896 135.2 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 1893 132.2 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–129 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.0 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.