H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Chris Evert H2H: 1-10 (incl. walkovers)

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Chris Evert: 0–10 excluding walkovers; 1–10 including 1 walkover. Across 11 main-draw results including walkovers, Chris Evert leads 4–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1987 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H including walkovers
1 – 10
11 main-draw results
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #3 6-2 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jun 17, 1987* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert #2 6-0 6-0 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sharon Walsh Pete (w/o) Chris Evert Match data Oct 6, 1983* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Sep 26, 1980* R16 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 14, 1980* R16 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Sep 29, 1978* R16 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Sep 2, 1977* R128 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Sep 18, 1975* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-4 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Mar 28, 1974* R32 New York WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 7-5 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jun 22, 1973* R16 London Rothmans WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-4 6-0 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Apr 1, 1973* R16 New York WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,719 0 7 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,678 0 7 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,615 0 7 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,709 0 7 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,840 0 8 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,757 0 8 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,787 0 8 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,797 0 8 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,623 0 8 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,599 0 8 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.42 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.41 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.33 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71
23 1975 1662 127.7 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 +0.15 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -163 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.29 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77
25 1977 1720 135.3 — — — — +62 -286 +40 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.10 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52
26 1978 1679 127.1 — — — — -13 -250 +61 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 -0.71 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00
27 1979 1615 121.5 — — — — -26 — +89 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.88 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -130 -187 +1 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.4 -3.84 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42
29 1981 1841 144.0 — — — — -77 — +12 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.17 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58
30 1982 1758 137.6 — — — — -81 — +74 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85
31 1983 1788 131.0 — — — — -87 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.20 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46
32 1984 1798 135.6 — — — — -156 — +84 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70
33 1985 1623 115.8 — — — — +9 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.34 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78
34 1986 1599 97.4 — — — — -3 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27
35 1987 1598 109.9 — — — — -27 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.9 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.2 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.