H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Jana Novotna H2H: 0-1
Jana Novotna holds a 1–0 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1987 Wimbledon third round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jana Novotna | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sharon Walsh Pete | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 30 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |
| 31 | 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |