H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 2-6

Kathy Jordan holds a 6–2 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 2–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1985 Melbourne quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main-draw meetings
Kathy Jordan
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Jordan 6-2 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data May 18, 1985* QF Melbourne WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Jordan #12 6-3 5-7 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jan 7, 1985 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Jordan 6-4 4-6 7-5 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Nov 24, 1983* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Kathy Jordan 2-6 6-2 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 17, 1983* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 1-6 6-1 Kathy Jordan Match data Jun 6, 1983* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Kathy Jordan 7-5 1-6 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Apr 29, 1983* R16 Atlanta WTA 250 Hard
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-3 6-4 Kathy Jordan Match data Jan 4, 1982 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Jordan 6-1 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 29, 1980* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Kathy Jordan #520 #5 44 2,093 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Kathy Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,893 0 1
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,001 0 1
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,921 0 1
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,884 0 2
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,009 0 2
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,023 0 2
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,721 0 7 1985 28–15 65.1% #12 1,979 0 2
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,614 0 7 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,710 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,839 0 8 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,756 0 8 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,796 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,622 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,506 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Kathy Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Kathy Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1978 1561 118.9 — — — — — — +39 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1979 1894 155.9 — — — — +33 — -200 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.19
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.53 1980 2001 163.9 — — — — +36 -360 -260 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.58
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.65 1981 1921 148.1 — — — — +51 -258 -73 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.1 +1.06
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -0.07 1982 1884 146.3 — — — — +58 -205 -59 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.84
23 1975 1662 127.6 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 -0.06 1983 2010 155.5 — — — — -21 -247 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.02
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -162 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.25 1984 2024 159.6 — — — — -49 -276 +117 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.73
25 1977 1722 135.0 — — — — +59 -287 +38 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.15 1985 1979 155.4 — — — — +58 — +38 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.92
26 1978 1678 126.6 — — — — -13 -250 +62 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.38 1986 1911 153.3 — — — — +58 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.31
27 1979 1615 121.3 — — — — -28 — +90 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.84 1987 1892 137.2 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.65
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -133 -187 0 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 -4.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1839 143.7 — — — — -75 — +13 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.13 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
30 1982 1756 137.4 — — — — -79 — +76 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +34 — +142 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37
31 1983 1787 130.8 — — — — -86 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1797 135.4 — — — — -156 — +86 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1623 115.7 — — — — +8 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 1599 97.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 1598 109.8 — — — — -28 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.8 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.1 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 2094 160.4 — — — — +32 -275 -8 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.