H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Kim Jones H2H: 0-2

Kim Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 6-1 7-5 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jun 19, 1985* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Kim Jones 7-6 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jun 20, 1984* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,721 0 7 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,614 0 7 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,710 0 7 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,839 0 8 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,756 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,796 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,622 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,506 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.53 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.65 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -0.07 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1975 1662 127.6 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 -0.06 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -162 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.25 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1977 1722 135.0 — — — — +59 -287 +38 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.15 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1978 1678 126.6 — — — — -13 -250 +62 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.38 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1979 1615 121.3 — — — — -28 — +90 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.84 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -133 -187 0 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 -4.01 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70
29 1981 1839 143.7 — — — — -75 — +13 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.13 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24
30 1982 1756 137.4 — — — — -79 — +76 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1787 130.8 — — — — -86 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1797 135.4 — — — — -156 — +86 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1623 115.7 — — — — +8 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 1599 97.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 1598 109.8 — — — — -28 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.8 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.1 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.