H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-0
Sharon Walsh Pete holds a 1–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1985 Key Biscayne second round 2-6 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1985* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sharon Walsh Pete | 2-6 6-1 7-6 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sharon Walsh Pete | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |