H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 2-2
Sharon Walsh Pete and Marie Pinterova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marie Pinterova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1982 Mahwah second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-3 6-3 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Dec 4, 1981* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-1 7-5 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| May 19, 1977* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-2 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1973* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marie Pinterova | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sharon Walsh Pete | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |