H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-2
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 2–1 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1983 Hartford third round 7-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1983* | Hartford | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sharon Walsh Pete | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1982* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-2 6-2 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1981* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sharon Walsh Pete | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |