H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 3-7

Mima Jausovec holds a 7–3 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 3–2 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1983 Mahwah round of 64 7-5 6-1.

USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 7
10 main-draw meetings
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 7-5 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 24, 1983* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-4 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Dec 5, 1982* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Mima Jausovec 7-5 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Mar 4, 1982* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 4-6 6-2 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Dec 6, 1981* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-4 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Oct 2, 1981* R16 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Sep 19, 1981* QF Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 7-5 7-5 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Feb 2, 1979* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jun 1, 1978* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Mar 31, 1977* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Sharon Walsh Pete 7-5 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 25, 1977* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,719 0 7 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,678 0 7 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,615 0 7 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,709 0 7 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,840 0 8 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,757 0 8 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,787 0 8 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,797 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,599 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.42 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.41 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.33 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1975 1662 127.7 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 +0.15 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -163 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.29 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 1977 1720 135.3 — — — — +62 -286 +40 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.10 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 1978 1679 127.1 — — — — -13 -250 +61 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 -0.71 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 1979 1615 121.5 — — — — -26 — +89 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.88 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -130 -187 +1 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.4 -3.84 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 1981 1841 144.0 — — — — -77 — +12 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.17 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 1982 1758 137.6 — — — — -81 — +74 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 1983 1788 131.0 — — — — -87 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.20 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
32 1984 1798 135.6 — — — — -156 — +84 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1623 115.8 — — — — +9 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 1599 97.4 — — — — -3 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 1598 109.9 — — — — -27 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.9 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.2 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.