H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1

Sharon Walsh Pete and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1988 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #69 6-2 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Jun 22, 1988* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-3 3-6 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #52 Match data Jun 24, 1987* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,721 0 7 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,614 0 7 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,710 0 7 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,839 0 8 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,756 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,796 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,622 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,506 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.53 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.65 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -0.07 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1975 1662 127.6 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 -0.06 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -162 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.25 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1977 1722 135.0 — — — — +59 -287 +38 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.15 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1978 1678 126.6 — — — — -13 -250 +62 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.38 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1979 1615 121.3 — — — — -28 — +90 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.84 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -133 -187 0 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 -4.01 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1981 1839 143.7 — — — — -75 — +13 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.13 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
30 1982 1756 137.4 — — — — -79 — +76 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1787 130.8 — — — — -86 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1797 135.4 — — — — -156 — +86 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1623 115.7 — — — — +8 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 1599 97.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 1598 109.8 — — — — -28 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.8 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.1 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.