H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1

Sharon Walsh Pete and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1988 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nathalie Herreman #69 6-2 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Jun 24, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Sharon Walsh Pete 6-3 3-6 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,894 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,833 0 2 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,707 0 2 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,729 0 3 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,653 0 4 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,774 0 7 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,620 0 7 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,722 0 7 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,620 0 7 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,712 0 7 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,841 0 8 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,758 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,810 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,808 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,627 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,602 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —