H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 1-5

Pam Teeguarden holds a 5–1 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Pam Teeguarden leads 4–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1978 Chichester semifinal 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1978* Chichester WTA 250 SF Grass Pam Teeguarden 7-6 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Nov 24, 1977* Melbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Teeguarden 6-3 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Nov 17, 1977* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Grass Pam Teeguarden 6-2 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Mar 3, 1977* San Francisco WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sharon Walsh Pete 7-6 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Mar 23, 1974* Akron WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Teeguarden 7-5 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Jun 15, 1973* Nottingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Pam Teeguarden 6-2 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,894 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,509 0 0
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,833 0 2 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,506 0 0
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,707 0 2 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,629 0 1
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,729 0 3 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,681 0 1
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,653 0 4 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,874 0 1
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,774 0 7 1973 21–22 48.8% — 1,846 0 1
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,905 0 3
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,620 0 7 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,815 0 3
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,722 0 7 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,775 0 3
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,783 0 3
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,620 0 7 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,740 0 3
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,712 0 7 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,748 0 3
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,841 0 8 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,758 0 8 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,788 0 4
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,810 0 8 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,808 0 8 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,653 0 4
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,627 0 8 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,616 0 4
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,602 0 8 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —