H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Paulina Peisachov H2H: 1-2
Paulina Peisachov holds a 2–1 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 1–0 on carpet, while Paulina Peisachov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paulina Peisachov won the 1976 Kauai third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1976* | Kauai | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Paulina Peisachov | 6-3 6-3 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1975* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Paulina Peisachov | 7-6 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1973* | Durham | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-2 6-3 | Paulina Peisachov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Paulina Peisachov | — | — | — | 1,726 | 39 | 42 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sharon Walsh Pete | Paulina Peisachov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |