H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 2-3

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 3–2 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 2–1 on grass, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1987 Los Angeles second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 1987* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #18 6-4 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Nov 19, 1982* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank 6-4 3-6 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Feb 12, 1982* Kansas City WTA 250 R16 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank 6-4 7-6 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Dec 10, 1980* Adelaide WTA 500 R64 Grass Sharon Walsh Pete 4-6 6-3 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data
Jun 11, 1980* Chichester WTA 250 R32 Grass Sharon Walsh Pete 6-3 5-7 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,894 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,833 0 2 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,707 0 2 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,729 0 3 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,653 0 4 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,774 0 7 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,620 0 7 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,722 0 7 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,620 0 7 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,712 0 7 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,841 0 8 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,758 0 8 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,810 0 8 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,808 0 8 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,627 0 8 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,602 0 8 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —