H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Sandy Collins H2H: 1-2
Sandy Collins holds a 2–1 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Sandy Collins leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandy Collins won the 1982 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Sandy Collins | 6-3 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1981* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sharon Walsh Pete | 7-5 6-2 | Sandy Collins | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1981* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Sandy Collins | 6-3 6-3 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Sandy Collins | — | — | — | 1,823 | 89 | 151 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sharon Walsh Pete | Sandy Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,394 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |