H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-9

Virginia Ruzici holds a 9–0 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 4–0 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1983 Detroit semifinal 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 9
9 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici 6-4 7-6 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Oct 7, 1983* SF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 7-6 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 17, 1982* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-2 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Aug 27, 1981* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-2 7-5 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Dec 11, 1980* R32 Adelaide International WTA 500 Grass
Virginia Ruzici 6-4 6-0 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Oct 19, 1978* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Ruzici 5-7 7-5 7-5 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Oct 12, 1978* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 7-5 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data May 25, 1978* R32 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Ruzici 6-4 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Oct 13, 1977* R32 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data Nov 1, 1974* R16 Cardiff WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,721 0 7 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,614 0 7 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,710 0 7 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,839 0 8 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,756 0 8 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,786 0 8 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,796 0 8 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,622 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,506 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Virginia Ruzici
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
20 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3% 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5%
23 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
24 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5%
25 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6%
26 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2%
27 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
29 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
30 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5% — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Virginia Ruzici
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
18 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98
19 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04
20 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.53 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38
21 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.65 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76
22 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -0.07 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12
23 1975 1662 127.6 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 -0.06 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09
24 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -162 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.25 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12
25 1977 1722 135.0 — — — — +59 -287 +38 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.15 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80
26 1978 1678 126.6 — — — — -13 -250 +62 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.38 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70
27 1979 1615 121.3 — — — — -28 — +90 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.84 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11
28 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -133 -187 0 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 -4.01 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73
29 1981 1839 143.7 — — — — -75 — +13 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.13 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89
30 1982 1756 137.4 — — — — -79 — +76 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16
31 1983 1787 130.8 — — — — -86 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.16 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44
32 1984 1797 135.4 — — — — -156 — +86 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99
33 1985 1623 115.7 — — — — +8 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1986 1599 97.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1987 1598 109.8 — — — — -28 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1507 84.8 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 135.1 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34 — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.