H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sharon Walsh Pete vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-2
Zina Garrison holds a 2–1 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1984 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-4 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sharon Walsh Pete | 4-6 6-4 9-7 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1983* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-7 6-3 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Nov 24, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sharon Walsh Pete | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |